Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Mercedes CLK engine produces 8 HP less power than Nissan 200 SX, but torque is 5 NM more than Nissan 200 SX. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.9 | |
|
The Nissan 200 SX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Nissan 200 SX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 5 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLK has 113 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |