Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 279 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 86 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 12.4 | |
| Mercedes CLK consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but higher. Mercedes CLK is 34 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |