Mercedes CLK 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Mercedes CLK
2000 - 2003
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP143 HP
Torque: 230 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds11 seconds
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 30 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway950 km on highway
640 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.49 m
Width: 1.72 m1.76 m
Height: 1.38 m1.37 m
Mercedes CLK is 8 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data300 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0201`915
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 44004600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv