Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Audi A4 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes CLK and Audi A4 have the same engine power, but Mercedes CLK torque is 80 NM less than Audi A4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The Audi A4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Audi A4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mercedes CLK and Audi A4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 246 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A4, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Audi A4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi A4, so Audi A4 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A4 has
| |