Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes SLK 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 191 HP less power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Mercedes SLK. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.27 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 56 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes CLK is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |