Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes SLK 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 34 HP less power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mercedes SLK. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.4 | |
| Mercedes CLK consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.26 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 56 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes CLK is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |