Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Lexus SC 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 419 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Lexus SC is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 123 HP less power than Lexus SC, whereas torque is 189 NM less than Lexus SC. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus SC, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 5 cm longer than the Lexus SC, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`020 kg | 2`110 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`615 kg | 1`815 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 405 kg | 295 kg | |
| Mercedes CLK load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Lexus SC. Therefore, Mercedes CLK is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Lexus SC has
| |