Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 32 HP more power than Chrysler Stratus, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Chrysler Stratus. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.3 | |
| Mercedes CLK consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Stratus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Stratus) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller. Mercedes CLK is 33 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 1.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |