Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 30 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.4 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but higher. Mercedes CLK is 34 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |