Mercedes CLK 2000 vs BMW Z3 1996

 
Mercedes CLK
2000 - 2003
BMW Z3
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP140 HP
Torque: 230 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9.5 seconds
Mercedes CLK engine produces 23 HP more power than BMW Z3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than BMW Z3. Despite the higher power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.58.0
The BMW Z3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway850 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.02 m
Width: 1.72 m1.69 m
Height: 1.38 m1.29 m
Mercedes CLK is larger.
Mercedes CLK is 55 cm longer than the BMW Z3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data165 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW Z3, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0201`435
Safety: no datano data
Quality:Mercedes CLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z3 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44007800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW Z3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv