Mercedes CLK 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2001

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2000
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 136 HP143 HP
Torque: 190 NM200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds10 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 7 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.47.7
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 255 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway1050 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 580'000 km380'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes SLKUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.49 m
Width: 1.72 m1.76 m
Height: 1.38 m1.37 m
Mercedes CLK is 8 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data300 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9801`885
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 44004600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv