Mercedes CLK 2003 vs Mercedes SL 2002

 
Mercedes CLK
2003 - 2005
Mercedes SL
2002 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.4 Petrol5.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 367 HP476 HP
Torque: 510 NM700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds4.7 seconds
Mercedes SL is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 109 HP less power than Mercedes SL, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Mercedes SL. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.314.2
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SL, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 500 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
690 km on highway750 km on highway
Mercedes SL gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes SLKInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes G klase, Mercedes CLS
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.54 m
Width: 1.74 m1.82 m
Height: 1.41 m1.30 m
Mercedes CLK is 10 cm longer than the Mercedes SL, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 276 litres235 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
390 litres317 litres
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes CLK has 41 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SL. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes CLK (by 73 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes SL.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2252`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 740017 200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mercedes SL has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv