Mercedes CLK 2003 vs Mercedes C class 2007
Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 13 HP less power than Mercedes C class, but torque is 10 NM more than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.1 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Chrysler Crossfire | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK is 6 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 276 litres | 475 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
390 litres | no data | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes CLK has 199 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Mercedes CLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.84 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.039999999999999 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`185 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 235 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6000 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |