Mercedes CLK 2003 vs Mercedes CLK 2002
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mercedes CLK 2003 and Mercedes CLK 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes CLK 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2003 and Mercedes CLK 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 276 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
390 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2002 has more luggage space. Mercedes CLK 2003 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`155 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |