Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

 
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2006
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2006
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.4 Petrol5.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 367 HP367 HP
Torque: 510 NM510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 seconds5.2 seconds
Mercedes CLK 2005 and Mercedes CLK 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes CLK 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.112.8
The Mercedes CLK 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK 2005 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 510 km in combined cycle480 km in combined cycle
Mercedes CLK 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.65 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2005 and Mercedes CLK 2005 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 276 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK 2005 has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK 2005 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2005.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`225no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 72004800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mercedes CLK has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv