Mercedes CLK 2006 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

 
Mercedes CLK
2006 - 2009
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2006
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.0 Petrol5.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 388 HP306 HP
Torque: 530 NM460 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.3 seconds5.9 seconds
Mercedes CLK 2006 is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK 2006 engine produces 82 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 2005, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mercedes CLK 2005. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.610.9
Real fuel consumption: 13.3 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Mercedes CLK 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes CLK 2006 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK 2006 could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK 2006 consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 530 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
460 km with real consumption570 km with real consumption
Mercedes CLK 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.65 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2006 and Mercedes CLK 2005 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 276 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK 2005 has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK 2006 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2005.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`115
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 72004800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv