Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

 
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 231 HP231 HP
Torque: 300 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds7.4 seconds
Mercedes CLK 2005 and Mercedes CLK 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes CLK 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.39.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.8 l/100km9.8 l/100km
By specification Mercedes CLK 2005 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK 2005 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years13 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.65 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2005 and Mercedes CLK 2005 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 276 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK 2005 has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK 2005 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2005.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`035
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 72004800
Pros and Cons:
    Mercedes CLK has
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv