Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Alfa Romeo 159 2005

 
Mercedes CLK
1997 - 1999
Alfa Romeo 159
2005 - 2008
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 136 HP160 HP
Torque: 190 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.7 seconds
Alfa Romeo 159 is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 24 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 159, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.7
The Alfa Romeo 159 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 159, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway1060 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 159 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.66 m
Width: 1.72 m1.83 m
Height: 1.37 m1.42 m
Mercedes CLK is smaller.
Mercedes CLK is 9 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 159, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres405 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CLK has 15 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 159. The Alfa Romeo 159 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 159.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8002`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 14002800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv