Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 279 HP | 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
| Mercedes CLK 1999 and Mercedes CLK 1998 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes CLK 1999 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1998, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK 1999 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK 1999 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1998. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1999 and Mercedes CLK 1998 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |