Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2002
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 224 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK 1999 engine produces 6 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 2002, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mercedes CLK 2002. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.4 | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 1999 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 is smaller. Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2002, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 435 litres | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
| |