Mercedes CLK 1999 vs BMW 3 series 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 74 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 125 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Chrysler Crossfire | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is larger. Mercedes CLK is 14 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 435 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes CLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`920 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`495 kg | 1`285 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 475 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |