Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Ford Mustang 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 4 HP more power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 18 NM less than Ford Mustang. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes CLK is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`870 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
| |