Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK 2000 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 1997, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.8 | |
| Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1997, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2000 and Mercedes CLK 1997 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |