Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes C class 2000

	Mercedes CLK 2000 - 2002	Mercedes C class 2000 - 2002
Body:	Coupe	Sedan
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.3 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	197 HP	129 HP
Torque:	280 NM	185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	8.1 seconds	11 seconds
	Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 68 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.6	9.4
	Mercedes CLK consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	62 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	640 km in combined cycle	650 km in combined cycle
	860 km on highway	910 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.57 m	4.53 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.73 m
Height:	1.37 m	1.43 m
	Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	420 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	10.7 meters	10.8 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight (kg):	1`870	1`500

Safety:	no data
Quality:	above average	average
	Mercedes CLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€):	2000	1400
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes CLK has more power more dynamic fewer faults	Mercedes C klase has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions