Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 129 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 64 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
590 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |