Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2000
Mercedes C class
2000 - 2002
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 193 HP129 HP
Torque: 280 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds11.6 seconds
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 64 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.99.5
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km10.0 l/100km
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway870 km on highway
590 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.53 m
Width: 1.72 m1.73 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`500
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 20001400
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mercedes C klase has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv