Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2002

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2000
Mercedes CLK
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Petrol2.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 193 HP170 HP
Torque: 280 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.4 seconds9.2 seconds
Mercedes CLK 1999 is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK 1999 engine produces 23 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 2002, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes CLK 2002. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.810.8
The Mercedes CLK 1999 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK 1999 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 1999 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway790 km on highway
Mercedes CLK 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK 1999 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mercedes SLKInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK 2002 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.64 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.37 m1.41 m
Mercedes CLK 1999 is smaller.
Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2002, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK 1999 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2002.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2002.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8502`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 20003000
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes CLK has
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv