Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK 2000 engine produces 27 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 1997, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes CLK 1997. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLK 1997 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1997, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1997. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2000 and Mercedes CLK 1997 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |