Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes CLK 2000 and Mercedes CLK 2002 have the same engine power, but Mercedes CLK 2000 torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes CLK 2002. Mercedes CLK 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLK 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK 2000 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes CLK 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mercedes CLK 2002 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes CLK 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2000 is smaller. Mercedes CLK 2000 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2002, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 2000 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 435 litres | |
| Mercedes CLK 2000 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 2000 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |