Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes C class 2000

 
Mercedes CLK
2000 - 2002
Mercedes C class
2000 - 2002
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP163 HP
Torque: 230 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.7 seconds
Mercedes CLK and Mercedes C class have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.39.5
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km10.0 l/100km
By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway880 km on highway
610 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.53 m
Width: 1.72 m1.73 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`500
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 20001600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • fewer faults
Mercedes C klase has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv