Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes E class 1995

 
Mercedes CLK
2000 - 2002
Mercedes E class
1995 - 1999
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP136 HP
Torque: 230 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds11.4 seconds
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 27 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.49.1
Mercedes CLK consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway940 km on highway
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.80 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.37 m1.44 m
Mercedes CLK is smaller.
Mercedes CLK is 23 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres515 litres
Mercedes E class has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK has 95 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`940
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 20001400
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Mercedes E klase has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv