Mercedes CLK 2000 vs BMW 3 series 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 143 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 20 HP more power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 30 NM more than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.2 | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
Mercedes CLK is 8 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 410 litres | |
Mercedes CLK has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`810 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |