Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000

	Mercedes CLK 1999 - 2000	Mercedes C class 2000 - 2002
Body:	Coupe	Sedan
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	136 HP	129 HP
Torque:	190 NM	185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	11 seconds	11 seconds
	Mercedes CLK engine produces 7 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mercedes C class.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.4	9.4
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	62 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	650 km in combined cycle	650 km in combined cycle
	870 km on highway	910 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.57 m	4.53 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.73 m
Height:	1.37 m	1.43 m
	Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	420 litres	455 litres
	Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes CLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter:	10.7 meters	10.8 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight:	1`800 kg	1`935 kg
Net weight:	1`300 kg	1`380 kg
Load capacity:	500 kg	555 kg
	Mercedes CLK load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Mercedes C class. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.

Safety:	no data
Quality:	average	average
Average price (€):	3000	1600
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes CLK has more power	Mercedes C klase has roomier boot higher carrying (cargo) capacity fewer faults lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions