Mercedes CLK 2002 vs Mercedes CLS 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 102 HP less power than Mercedes CLS, but torque is 50 NM more than Mercedes CLS. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 450'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes G klase | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes CLK is 27 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Mercedes CLK has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mercedes CLS has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mercedes CLS, so Mercedes CLS quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |