Mercedes CLK 2002 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2002 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK 2002 engine produces 20 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 2005, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Mercedes CLK 2005. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLK 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK 2002 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK 2002 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK 2002 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 435 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |