Mercedes CLK 2002 vs Honda Civic 2003

 
Mercedes CLK
2002 - 2005
Honda Civic
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.6 Petrol1.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 170 HP120 HP
Torque: 240 NM152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds9.7 seconds
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 50 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.47.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.6 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 510 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway870 km on highway
580 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Civic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 10 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klaseInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Honda FR-V, Honda Stream
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mercedes CLK engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.48 m
Width: 1.74 m1.69 m
Height: 1.41 m1.40 m
Mercedes CLK is larger.
Mercedes CLK is 16 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres441 litres
Despite its longer length, Mercedes CLK has 6 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Mercedes CLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`570
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Honda Civic has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes CLK, so Honda Civic quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 28001600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
Honda Civic has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv