Mercedes CLK 2002 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Crossfire is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 48 HP less power than Chrysler Crossfire, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Chrysler Crossfire. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Crossfire engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Crossfire might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.30 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 58 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 215 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLK has 220 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Crossfire, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Chrysler Crossfire has
| |