Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes CLK) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Celica) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 42 HP less power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 160 NM more than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Celica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.32 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes CLK is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |