Mercedes CLK 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 4.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
880 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
Mercedes CLK is 7 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 440 litres | |
Mercedes CLK has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | average | |
Mercedes CLK has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Mercedes CLK quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4400 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |