Mercedes CLK 1998 vs SAAB 9-3 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
1998 - 1999
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.22.0 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 136 - 224 HP130 - 225 HP
Torque: 190 - 315 NM177 - 342 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 12.8 seconds7.1 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 10.68.8 - 11.0
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.63 m
Width: 1.72 m1.71 m
Height: 1.38 m1.43 m
Mercedes CLK is 6 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 237 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litresno data
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK has 58 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`013~ 1`823
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 38003800
Pros and Cons:
    SAAB 9-3 has
    • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv