Mercedes CLK 1998 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Stratus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 224 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 315 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 12.8 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 10.6 | 9.3 - 11.5 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller. Mercedes CLK is 33 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 237 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 1.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |