Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes SLK 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 136 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 190 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.2 | 9.1 - 9.5 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.29 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 57 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes CLK is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 348 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`031 kg | ~ 1`548 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`630 kg | ~ 1`213 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 401 kg | ~ 335 kg | |
| Mercedes CLK load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Mercedes SLK. Therefore, Mercedes CLK is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |