Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes SLK 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 136 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 190 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.2 | 9.1 - 9.5 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.29 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 57 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes CLK is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`031 | ~ 1`548 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |