Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 163 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | 5.4 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.2 | 9.1 - 12.3 | |
|
Mercedes CLK 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2003, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 276 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2003. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`031 | ~ 2`174 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
| |