Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2003
Mercedes CLK
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 5.41.8 - 5.4

Performance

Power: 136 - 347 HP163 - 367 HP
Torque: 190 - 510 NM240 - 510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 - 12.8 seconds5.4 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 12.29.1 - 12.3
Mercedes CLK 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2003.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.64 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2003, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data276 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data390 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2003.
Gross weight: ~ 2`031 kg~ 2`174 kg
Net weight:~ 1`630 kg~ 1`649 kg
Load capacity:~ 401 kg~ 525 kg
Mercedes CLK 1999 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Mercedes CLK 2003. Therefore, Mercedes CLK 2003 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 42009600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes CLK has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv