Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CL 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Mercedes CLK is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mercedes CL is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 5.0 - 5.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 306 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 460 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | 4.8 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.2 | 11.4 - 14.7 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CL. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller. Mercedes CLK is 42 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes CL, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`031 | ~ 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |