Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Sebring can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 141 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 188 - 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | 11.4 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.2 | 10.2 - 10.6 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller. Mercedes CLK is 35 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`031 | ~ 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |