Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Mercedes CLK 1999 - 2003	Chevrolet Camaro 1998 - 2002
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Engines:	2.0 - 5.4	3.8
Performance
Power:	136 - 347 HP	193 HP
Torque:	190 - 510 NM	305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.2 - 12.8 seconds	8.5 - 8.8 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.4 - 12.2	11.7 - 12.4
	Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.57 m	4.91 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.88 m
Height:	1.38 m	1.30 m
	Mercedes CLK is smaller, but higher. Mercedes CLK is 34 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	no data	no data
Turning diameter:	10.7 meters	11.6 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 2`031	no data

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	average	no data
Average price (€):	4400	3000
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes CLK has lower fuel consumption better manoeuvrability	Chevrolet Camaro has lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Performance