Mercedes CLK 1999 vs BMW 3 series 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 200 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 12.8 seconds | 6.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 12.2 | 7.7 - 10.0 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 8 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`031 | ~ 1`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |