Mercedes CLK 2003 vs SAAB 9-3 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
2003 - 2005
SAAB 9-3
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while SAAB 9-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 5.4 (petrol)1.9 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 163 - 367 HP150 - 250 HP
Torque: 240 - 510 NM240 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 10.5 seconds7.1 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.1 - 12.35.9 - 11.0
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.64 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.41 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK and SAAB 9-3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 276 litres235 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
390 litresno data
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes CLK has 41 litres more trunk space than the SAAB 9-3.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`174~ 2`061
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 60007000
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
SAAB 9-3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv