Mercedes CLK 2003 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 (petrol) | 1.8 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 367 HP | 150 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 240 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 10.5 seconds | 4.7 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 12.3 | 6.4 - 14.2 | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2003 is 1 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 276 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
390 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2005 has more luggage space. Mercedes CLK 2003 has 159 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2005. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`174 | ~ 2`071 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |