Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Volkswagen EOS can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 6.2 | 1.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 481 HP | 116 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 630 NM | 155 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 10.5 seconds | 6.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 14.4 | 6.1 - 9.2 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. On average, Mercedes CLK equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLK has 185 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |