Mercedes CLK 2005 vs BMW 3 series 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 6.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 481 HP | 156 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 630 NM | 200 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 10.5 seconds | 5.8 - 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 14.4 | 6.1 - 9.9 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Mercedes CLK equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 7 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLK has 180 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 2`119 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |